There is quite a list that Canadian rightly feel proud about such as having better beer than the Americans; adding colour to color and bestowing honour to honor with the extra “u”; and saying the last letter in the alphabet the way the Queen wants us too.
Now we can add one more thing we Canadians will brag about endlessly… having notoriously boring (but solvent) banks.
We are in a new era indeed when bankers become a source of national pride!
What Toronto can teach New York and London
Good and Boring
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts
Monday, February 01, 2010
Monday, May 04, 2009
Conceding risk capital in Canada
Another story about a Canadian researcher being lost to the US due to budget cuts.
This shouldn't be dismissed as another example of Canada's "brain drain." Sure, Canada and many other countries will always lose talent to the US because it is a bigger market, more things are happening, and there will always be more opportunity.
But there is no reason why this trend should be exacerbated by budget cuts. Quite the opposite, money should be spent in order to stem this tide as much as possible. This isn’t a cost, it is an investment in the future (yes, I know this is clichéd)
There are two clear negative repercussions to losing R&D talent:
1) It will be more difficult to attract foreign investment, especially VC money, to fuel innovative industries. People invest risk capital in countries where they see new products and services being developed. A leading indicator for this is the relative health of the local R&D community. A non-existent community means no innovations, which mean no outside risk capital coming into Canada.
2) It threatens Canada's future as a hub for innovation. If Canada wants to diversify its economy away from just commodities, then it needs to make this sort of long term investments. The hope of Canada becoming a center for any sort of innovation will be dimmed without active R&D investing, which will lead to the commercialization of products and the creation of industries later down the line.
What is the point of creating an "urban paradise" if no one is around to enjoy it?
This shouldn't be dismissed as another example of Canada's "brain drain." Sure, Canada and many other countries will always lose talent to the US because it is a bigger market, more things are happening, and there will always be more opportunity.
But there is no reason why this trend should be exacerbated by budget cuts. Quite the opposite, money should be spent in order to stem this tide as much as possible. This isn’t a cost, it is an investment in the future (yes, I know this is clichéd)
There are two clear negative repercussions to losing R&D talent:
1) It will be more difficult to attract foreign investment, especially VC money, to fuel innovative industries. People invest risk capital in countries where they see new products and services being developed. A leading indicator for this is the relative health of the local R&D community. A non-existent community means no innovations, which mean no outside risk capital coming into Canada.
2) It threatens Canada's future as a hub for innovation. If Canada wants to diversify its economy away from just commodities, then it needs to make this sort of long term investments. The hope of Canada becoming a center for any sort of innovation will be dimmed without active R&D investing, which will lead to the commercialization of products and the creation of industries later down the line.
What is the point of creating an "urban paradise" if no one is around to enjoy it?
Labels:
Canada,
global economy,
innovation,
risk,
technology,
US
Friday, May 23, 2008
Retire on Dilbert
Just read Dilbert. It is so simple it is genius, even I get it. As relevant now as it was two years ago.
Dilbert's 9-point financial plan worthy of economics Nobel - MarketWatch
Dilbert's 9-point financial plan worthy of economics Nobel - MarketWatch
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Now They Tell Us - Forbes.com
Ummmm... isn't the ability to evaluate risk kinda important? If we just throw our hands up and say we can't do it, doesn't that make investing a tad more difficult?
Now They Tell Us - Forbes.com
Now They Tell Us - Forbes.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)