This pretty much confirms what I've suspected all along, for some strange reason, Facebook is really popular in Canada, particularly my home town Toronto.
Over the course of a few weeks, I got a bunch of invitation to join Facebook from friends up in the Great White North. It took me quite by surprise because I've never really looked into Facebook here in SV, and there aren't many people I know around here who are into it.
Facebook | Oh Canada...
Friday, May 18, 2007
Thoughts on the Pigou Club
Greg Mankiw references two articles that support the “Pigou Club” thinking, which is basically a carbon tax should be levied to encourage “green” behavior and account for the true costs of carbon in the atmosphere.
I agree with this position and am encouraged that economists of Mankiw’s background and expertise support such a plan of action.
I won’t summarize the two articles, but I will highlight a couple of concerns that I have. Nothing I mention here means that I necessarily disagree with any of the points raised in the articles, just that these are things I thought of while I read them.
From Jeffery Sachs quoted in Scientific American:
The key to solving the climate change crisis is technology.
Broadly speaking, I agree with this point. But I do get nervous when someone says there is a single magic bullet solution to any large problem. I’m not sure that is what Sachs means, but to my mind technology and societal behavior change are equally important. True, new technologies could inspire societal behavioral change, I just think we need to be more up-front about that or talk about how to marry the two concepts.
For example, car-pooling is a behavior change, hybrids are a technology innovation; put the two together-- car-pooling in a hybrid—and now you’re really talking!
Sachs also mentioned low or zero emissions through clean coal. I’m far from smart enough to debate him but, is that for real? I should do more research.
The next article was from Fortune. One point made here on ethanol was:
The net effect is close to nil; if you doubt that assessment, check out this recent study by the Canadian government, which found that a 10 percent blend of corn-based ethanol would reduce emissions by about 1 percent.
Again, I’m sure this is true and I have been a little skeptical of the recent craze around ethanol. But to that point, we all know that with any new technology it starts out expensive and inefficient, but as it gains adoption, price goes down and efficiency goes up. So it is consistent to say that ethanol may not be very efficient now, but it is reasonable to assume that as it gains widespread use, its ability to offset emissions will increase.
Greg Mankiw's Blog: Readings for the Pigou Club
I agree with this position and am encouraged that economists of Mankiw’s background and expertise support such a plan of action.
I won’t summarize the two articles, but I will highlight a couple of concerns that I have. Nothing I mention here means that I necessarily disagree with any of the points raised in the articles, just that these are things I thought of while I read them.
From Jeffery Sachs quoted in Scientific American:
The key to solving the climate change crisis is technology.
Broadly speaking, I agree with this point. But I do get nervous when someone says there is a single magic bullet solution to any large problem. I’m not sure that is what Sachs means, but to my mind technology and societal behavior change are equally important. True, new technologies could inspire societal behavioral change, I just think we need to be more up-front about that or talk about how to marry the two concepts.
For example, car-pooling is a behavior change, hybrids are a technology innovation; put the two together-- car-pooling in a hybrid—and now you’re really talking!
Sachs also mentioned low or zero emissions through clean coal. I’m far from smart enough to debate him but, is that for real? I should do more research.
The next article was from Fortune. One point made here on ethanol was:
The net effect is close to nil; if you doubt that assessment, check out this recent study by the Canadian government, which found that a 10 percent blend of corn-based ethanol would reduce emissions by about 1 percent.
Again, I’m sure this is true and I have been a little skeptical of the recent craze around ethanol. But to that point, we all know that with any new technology it starts out expensive and inefficient, but as it gains adoption, price goes down and efficiency goes up. So it is consistent to say that ethanol may not be very efficient now, but it is reasonable to assume that as it gains widespread use, its ability to offset emissions will increase.
Greg Mankiw's Blog: Readings for the Pigou Club
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Footnotes to trade
Economist Dani Rodrik takes two separate looks at other issues that get attached to trade agreements. One is a look at labor and environmental issues (which he seems in favor of) and the other is IP and patent protection (of which, he seems a little more suspicious)
Dani Rodrik's weblog: Trade and environmental agreements in trade deals
Dani Rodrik's weblog: More on market-access rent-seekers
Dani Rodrik's weblog: Trade and environmental agreements in trade deals
Dani Rodrik's weblog: More on market-access rent-seekers
Sunday, May 06, 2007
Watching Blade Runner...
instead of studying.
Conversation between Roy Batty (a Nexus replicant, which is an artificial life form) to Chew, the genetic engineer who designed his eyes.
Chew: "You Nexus, huh? I design your eyes"
Roy Batty: "Chew... If only you could see what I've seen with your eyes."
Batty's line one of the greatest in cinema history. (And its engraved on my iPod)
Conversation between Roy Batty (a Nexus replicant, which is an artificial life form) to Chew, the genetic engineer who designed his eyes.
Chew: "You Nexus, huh? I design your eyes"
Roy Batty: "Chew... If only you could see what I've seen with your eyes."
Batty's line one of the greatest in cinema history. (And its engraved on my iPod)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)